User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0; Lenovo A7000-a Build/LRX21M) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.133 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 44.0Android 5.0unknown LenovoA7000Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.0LenovoA7000Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 5.0LenovoA7000mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 44.0Blink Android 5.0LenovoA7000-asmartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeAndroid 5.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403closeAndroid 5.0LenovoA7000-acloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.133WebKit 537.36Android 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 44Blink Android 5.0LenovoA7000mobile:smartyescloseclose0.05001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 44closeAndroid 5.0LenovoA7000Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:20 | by ThaDafinser