User agent detail

Mozilla/4.08 (N905imyu_W;FOMA;c500;TB)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
NECN905imyumobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close NECN905imyumobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoN905imyucloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NECN905imyumobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo N905imyu_Wcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoN905iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:20 | by ThaDafinser