User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia6700c-1/07.60; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/1.0.2.26.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6700c-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.07801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 1.0Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia6700c-1smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 07.60;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 1.0.2closeNokia Series 40 Nokia6700c-1closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 1.0.2.26.6Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6700c-1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 1.0.2Gecko Series40 Nokia6700 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia6700 classicFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:19 | by ThaDafinser