User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Gentoo x86_64; de-DE) Firefox/26.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 26.0Gentoo Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 26.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 26.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 26.0Gecko Gentoo desktop0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 26.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 26.0closeGentoo closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 26.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 26.0 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 26.0 desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 26.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:19 | by ThaDafinser