User agent detail

Mozilla/5.5 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.1) Sitespider+ b432.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Sitespider Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSitespiderclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.5 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:19 | by ThaDafinser