User agent detail

BREW-Applet/0x20068888 (BREW/3.1.5.20; DeviceId: 90086; Lang: zhcn) ucweb-squid
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
UC Browser Brew 3.1.5.20 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSquidBot/Crawler0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BREW-Applet 0x20068888closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser Brew 3.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBREW 3.1.5closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Brew 3.1.5.20mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:18 | by ThaDafinser