User agent detail

MQQBrowser/2.7 Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android A5000; in-id; A5000 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
QQbrowser 2.7Android unknownunknown SonyAlpha a5000Digital Camerayesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser 2.7WebKit Android SonyAlpha a5000Digital Camerayesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 2.7WebKit Android yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 2.7closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 2.7WebKit 533.1Android AcerAcer Iconia A500closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 2.7Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6StarA5000mobile:smartyescloseclose0.041 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:18 | by ThaDafinser