User agent detail

Opera Mini 4/SAMSUNG-GT-C3010/1.0 Openwave/6.2.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-C3010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungGT-C3010smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini SAMSUNG-GT-C3010close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Openwave 6.2.3close SamsungGT-C3010closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungGT-C3010mobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:18 | by ThaDafinser