User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7.3; U; Edition MacAppStore; xx) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.51
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 11.51OS X Lion 10.7Presto 2.9.168desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.51Presto 2.9MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.51closeOS X 10.7.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.51Presto Mac 10.7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.51closeOS X 10.7.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.51closeMac OS X 10.7.3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.51closeOS X 10.7.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.51Presto 2.9.168Mac OS X 10.7.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 11.51Presto 2.9.168OS X Lion 10.7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.51closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux zvav Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:17 | by ThaDafinser