User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux armv7l; xx; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20091127 Firefox/3.5 Maemo Browser 1.5.6 RX-51 N900
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
MicroB 1.5.6Maemo Gecko 1.9.2a1NokiaN900mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox Gecko Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.06601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MicroB 1.5Gecko Maemo NokiaN900tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maemo Browser 1.5.6closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maemo Browser 1.5.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5Gecko 20091127Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MicroB 1.5.6Gecko 1.9.2a1Maemo NokiaN900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5closeLinux armv7l NokiaN900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:17 | by ThaDafinser