User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Positivo Ypy L1000 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PositivoYpy L1000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.1.1PositivoYpy L1000closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.1.1PositivoYPY L1000tabletyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:17 | by ThaDafinser