User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; PMID701C Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PolaroidPMID701C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.06801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.27103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.0PolaroidPMID701Ctabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.0.4PolaroidPMID701Ccloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.0.4PolaroidPMID 701ctabletyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:17 | by ThaDafinser