User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; zh-cn;GiONEE-GN9000/GN9000 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit534.30(KHTML,like Gecko)Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 Id/DB1C35B7D0F8E3B5FFC207A366E945F7 RV/4.2.8 GNBR/2.1.3.w (securitypay,securityinstalled)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GioneeGN9000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.39404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2GioneeGN9000smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GioneeGN9000closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.4GioneeGN9000mobile:smartyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:16 | by ThaDafinser