User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.76 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 32.0.1700.76Windows 8.1Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.76closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.24002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 32.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.76closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 32.0.1700closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.76closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.25202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:16 | by ThaDafinser