User agent detail

stagefright/1.2 (Linux;Android 4.0.4;Motorola XT890 Build/8.7.1I-110_IFW-DE-32)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT890 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
stagefright 1.2WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
stagefright 1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Stagefright 1.2closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaRAZR imobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Stagefright 1.2 Android 4.0MotorolaDroid RAZR ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4MotorolaXT890closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Stagefright 1.2 Android 4.0.4MotorolaRAZR imobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:16 | by ThaDafinser