User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Sabayon Chrome/18.0.1025.151 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Chrome 18.0Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.15702 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.151closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.151closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Sabayon desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.151closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.151closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.151WebKit 535.19Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Linux desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.151closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:15 | by ThaDafinser