User agent detail

Alcatel-OH2/1.0 ObigoInternetBrowser/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOH2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 2.0 JAVA AlcatelOH2Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Alcatel-OH2 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM AlcatelOne Touch 355mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo 2 AlcatelOH2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close AlcatelOH2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.63106 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 2.0 AlcatelOH2mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo close AlcatelOne Touch 355Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:15 | by ThaDafinser