User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.2.1; zh-CN; vivo_Y19t) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.8.3.272 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
UC Browser 8.8.3.272Android 4.2.1 VivoVivo Y19tsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux MicromaxA110Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8 Android 4.2VivoVivo Y19tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.3closeAndroid 4.2.1closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.3.272 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko Android 4.2.1VivoY19Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:14 | by ThaDafinser