User agent detail

Lenovo S880/S100 Linux/3.0.13 Android/4.0.3 Release/12.12.2011 Browser/AppleWebKit534.30 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoS880 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Lenovo closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoS880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0LenovoS880smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoS880closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3LenovoS880mobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0LenovoS880Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:14 | by ThaDafinser