User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Symbian; U; S60 V5; en-US; SonyEricssonU1) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.9.0.277 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
UC Browser 8.9SymbianOS unknownunknown SonyEricssonU1Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.9U2 SymbianOS SonyEricssonU1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonP1imobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.9 Symbian OS Series 60 V5NokiaMobilefeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.9.0closeSymbian OS SonyEricssonU1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.9.0.277 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.9Gecko Series60 5NokiaS60 V5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Web Browser on Symbian 8closeSymbian S60 5SonyEricssonP1iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:14 | by ThaDafinser