User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; M-MP1051S2 Build/KTU84Q) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.78 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 43.0.2357.78Android 4.4.4Blink MediacomSmartPad 10.1 S2tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeAndroid 4.4.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.4MediacomSmartPad 10.1 S2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.4.4MediacomM-MP1051S2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.18002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.78WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.4.4MediacomSmartPad 10.1 S2tabletyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.78closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 43closeAndroid 4.4MediacomM-MP105S2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:14 | by ThaDafinser