User agent detail

MOT-A-2D/00.02 UP.Browser/4.1.27a1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaA-2D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.04401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-A-2D 00.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27a1close Motorolai285mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 MotorolaAsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.27close MotorolaA-2Dcloseclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.27a1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1a1 MotorolaA-2Dmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Motorolai285Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:14 | by ThaDafinser