User agent detail

DoCoMo/2.0 F04A(c100;TB;W24H17;ser353709020370762; icc8981100020732495171f)(c100;TB;W24H12)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/carrier-docomo.yaml
FujitsuF04Amobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
DoCoMo 2.0 JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
DoCoMo 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront close DoCoMomobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
DoCoMoF04Afeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF04Acloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
F04Acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
FujitsuF04Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F04Acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoF-04AFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:14 | by ThaDafinser