User agent detail

HTC-Radar+C110e/UCWEB2.2.0.157/47/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCRadar+C110e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-Radar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.2 HTCRadarsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.2.0close HTCRadar+C110ecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.2.0.157close closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.2.0.157 HTC Radarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.2Gecko HTCRadar+C110emobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:13 | by ThaDafinser