User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.558.0 Safari/534.31 UCBrowser/3.2.0.417
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-323.php
UC Browser 3.2MacOSX 10.6unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 3.2WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.14201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.558.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 17.0.558.0closeOS X 10.6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 17.0WebKit Mac 10.6desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.558.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 3.2.0closeMac OS X 10.6.3closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.558.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 3.2.0.417WebKit 534.31Mac OS X 10.6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 3.2 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.558.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.06201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:12 | by ThaDafinser