User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; IRON Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.66961
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
OdysIRON Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.66961closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.66961closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.66961closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.2.2OdysIRONcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iron closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
SRWare Iron WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 18.0Blink Android 4.2.2IRONtabletyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.66961closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.05501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:12 | by ThaDafinser