User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/537.32 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1425.0 Safari/537.32 SUSE/27.0.1425.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chrome Dev 27.0.1425.0SUSE Blink 537.32desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1425.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1425.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit SUSE 27.0desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1425.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1425closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1425.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1425.0WebKit 537.32Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 27.0.1425.0Blink SUSE desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1425.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:12 | by ThaDafinser