User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.0 (GT-S5233S/S5233SDDJE2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
OneBrowser 3.0unknown unknownunknown SamsungGT-S5233SMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.0WebKit SamsungGT-S5233SMobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.0WebKit SamsungGT-S5233Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49705 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.0 closeclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:11 | by ThaDafinser