User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; pl) Chrome/37.0.2049.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 APUSBrowser/1.1.417 Safari/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
APUSBrowser 1.1WinXP 5.2unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
APUSBrowser 1.1Blink WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Windows Server 2003desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 37.0.2049closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.052 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2049.0 Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 37.0.2049.0 Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2049.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 37.0.2062.120closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:11 | by ThaDafinser