User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.1.2; en-US; GT-S7262) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.8.1.359 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
UC Browser 8.8Android 4.1unknown SamsungGT-S7262Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android 4.1SamsungGT-S7262Mobile Phoneyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SamsungGT-S7262mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8 Android 4.1SamsungGT-S7262smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.1closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-S7262closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.1.359 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Star Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-S7262Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:11 | by ThaDafinser