User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S5050/S5050BOIJ1 NetFront/3.5 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS5050 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.04501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-S5050 S5050BOIJ1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungGT-S5050mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront SamsungS5050smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungS5050closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungS5050mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT-S5050Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:11 | by ThaDafinser