User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.43 Spark/2.x Safari/537.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Baidu Spark 2Windows 8WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Baidu Spark 2WebKit Windows 8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1410closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose3.56636 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.43WebKit 537.31Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 26Webkit 537.31Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.43closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 26.0.1393.2closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:10 | by ThaDafinser