User agent detail

AiMeiTuan /samsung-2.3.6-GT-I9050-800x480-240-4.1.2-116-351910054299883-dianshi1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsung2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AiMeiTuan closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Samsung2.3.6-GT-I9050-800x480-240-4.1.2-116-351910054299883-dianshi1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Samsung2smartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Samsung2closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung2.3.6-GT-I9050-800x480-240-4.1.2-116-351910054299883-dianshi1mobile:featureyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:10 | by ThaDafinser