User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; zh-CN) AppleWebKit/533+ (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Apple Mail 0.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.04901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeWindows 6.1email-clientcloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.14801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 533Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:10 | by ThaDafinser