User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; LG-C395) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGC395 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close LGLG-C305mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGC395smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGC395closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.326 LGLGC395closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Gecko LGC395mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:10 | by ThaDafinser