User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Opera 25.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 25.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1614.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1614closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.101closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1614.50WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 25.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.10201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:09 | by ThaDafinser