User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.4; Linux 2.6.32-39-generic; X11; i686; en_US) KHTML/4.4.5 (like Gecko) Kubuntu
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.4Kubuntu KHTML 4.4.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.4KHTML Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.4KHTML Kubuntu desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.4;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.4closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.4 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.4KHTML 4.4.5Kubuntu desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:09 | by ThaDafinser