User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone5,2; iPhone; U; CPU OS 7_1_1 like Mac OS X; de_DE) com.google.GooglePlus/33839 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/N42AP (gzip)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-237.php
Google+ App 0.0iOS 7.1unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Google+ App WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Google Plus iOS 7.1AppleiPhone 5smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.1.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.1.1closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPhone5,2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeiPhone OS 7.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google+ iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:08 | by ThaDafinser