User agent detail

Vodafone/1.0/0Vodafone715/B116 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q04A MMS/Obigo-MMS/Q04A SyncML/HW-SyncML/1.0 Java/QVM/4.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Obigo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vodafone 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM HuaweiVodafone 715mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo 0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close closeclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 4A mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile 0Vodafone715closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close HuaweiVodafone 715Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:08 | by ThaDafinser