User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu Chromium/31.0.1650.63 Chrome/31.0.1650.63 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chromium 31.0.1650.63Ubuntu Blink desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 31.0Blink Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 31.0.1650.63closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 31.0Blink Ubuntu desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 31.0.1650closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.28303 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 31.0.1650.63WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 31.0.1650.63Blink Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:07 | by ThaDafinser