User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.1 Safari/534.51.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WebKit Nightly 534 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.09101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.1closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.1closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 534closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.1WebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50705 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
WebKit Nightly Build Webkit 534Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.3closeen_US Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:07 | by ThaDafinser