User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_4_11; xx) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 3.1.2Mac OS X 10.4Webkit 525.18desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.1WebKit MacOSX 10.4AppleMacintoshDesktop0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 3.1.2closeOS X 10.4.11desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 3.1WebKit Mac 10.4desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.1.2closeOS X 10.4.11closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 3.1.2closeMac OS X 10.4.11closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 3.1.2closeOS X 10.4.11closecloseclosecloseclose0.19802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 3.1.2WebKit 525.18Mac OS X 10.4.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 3.1.2Webkit 525.18Mac OS X 10.4desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.0.4closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:06 | by ThaDafinser