User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Iriver ; EB07 ) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/ereader/other.yaml
Webkit 534.16iRiverStory HD EB07ereaderyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.0WebKit 534.16 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.16 iRiverStory HD EB07ereaderyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:06 | by ThaDafinser