User agent detail

SAMSUNG-C3110/1.0 Openwave/6.2.3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungC3110 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-C3110 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101close SamsungGT-C3110mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SamsungC3110smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Openwave 6.2.3close SamsungC3110closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.101 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungC3110mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-C3110Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:05 | by ThaDafinser