User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Safari/533.18.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X 10.6.5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0.2closeOS X 10.6.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit Mac 10.6desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0.2closeOS X 10.6.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0.2closeMac OS X 10.6.5closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0.2closeOS X 10.6.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.12001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.0.2WebKit 533.18.1Mac OS X 10.6.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.0.2Webkit 533.18.1Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.0.5closeMac OS X 10.6.8Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:05 | by ThaDafinser