User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chedot Chrome/43.0.2345.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Chedot 43.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chedot 43.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2345closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2345.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 43.0.2345.0Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2345.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 43.0.2357.81closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.09301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:04 | by ThaDafinser