User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; HTC_SensationXE_Beats_Z715e; en-lu) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSensationXE Beats Z715e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit Mac 10.6HTCSensationXE Beats Z715esmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0closeMac OS X 10.6.3HTCSensationXE Beats Z715ecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.13101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.0WebKit 533.16Mac OS X 10.6.3HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose1.72917 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit Android HTCSensationXE Beats Z715emobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 4.0closeMac OS X 10.5.7HTCDisguised as MacintoshFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:04 | by ThaDafinser