User agent detail

dv(GT-S6102);pr(UCBrowser/9.8.5.442);ov(Android 2.3.6);ss(240*301);bt(GJ);pm(1);bv(0);nm(0);im(0);sr(0);nt(2);
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-627.php
UC Browser 9.8Android 2.3unknown SamsungGalaxy Y DuosMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.8 Android 2.3SamsungGalaxy Y DuosMobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
dv closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.8.5.442closeAndroid 2.3.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.8 Android 2.3SamsungGT-S6102smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.8.5closeAndroid 2.3.6closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.8.5.442 Android 2.3.6Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.8 Android 2.3.6mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:03 | by ThaDafinser