User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-678.php
Firefox 38.0Win7 6.138.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 38.0Gecko 38.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.04101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 38.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 38.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 38.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 38.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 38.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 38.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 38.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 38.0Gecko 38.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 38.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 38.0closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:03 | by ThaDafinser