User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows Phone; Opera Mini/8.0.4/36.2534; U; en) Presto/2.12.423 Version/12.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
Opera Mini 8.0WinPhone unknown2.8 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.8WinPhone Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 8.0.4closeWindows mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 8.0Presto Windows Phone yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 8.0.4closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 8.0.4closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 8.0.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 8.0.4Presto 2.12.423Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 8.0.4Presto 2.12.423Windows Phone mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.16closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.05801 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:32:03 | by ThaDafinser